Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection
Lýsing:
This book brings together researchers from the fields of international human rights law, EU law and constitutional law to reflect on the tug-of-war over the positioning of the centre of gravity of human rights protection in Europe. It addresses both the position of the Convention system vis-à-vis the Contracting States, and its positioning with respect to fundamental rights protection in the European Union.
The first part of the book focuses on interactions in this triangle from an institutional and constitutional point of view and reflects on how the key actors are trying to define their relationship with one another in a never-ending process. Having thus set the scene, the second part takes a critical look at the tools that have been developed at European level for navigating these complex relationships, in order to identify whether they are capable of responding effectively to the complexities of emerging realities in the triangular relationship between the EHCR, EU law and national law.
Annað
- Útgáfa:1
- Útgáfudagur: 2016-02-26
- Hægt að prenta út 2 bls.
- Hægt að afrita 2 bls.
- Format:ePub
- ISBN 13: 9781317309093
- Print ISBN: 9781138121249
- ISBN 10: 131730909X
Efnisyfirlit
- Cover Page
- Half Title page
- Series
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgement
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The paradox of human rights protection in Europe: two courts, one goal?
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The paradox of coherence and the Charter
- 3 The paradox of autonomy and the ECHR
- 4 The paradox of accession after Opinion 2/13
- 5 Conclusion: hierarchy, complexity and necessity?
- 3 The role of the European Court of Human Rights in the changing European human rights architecture
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The scope of the Charter as compared to the ECHR
- 3 The relationship between the EU Charter and the ECHR
- 4 Opinion 2/2013 CJEU17
- 5 Case law of the ECtHR
- 6 The problems facing the ECHR
- 6.1 The political and judicial environment
- 6.2 Institutional problems of the ECtHR
- 7 Concluding remarks
- 4 The European Court of Human Rights and national courts: a constitutional relationship?*
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The role of the ECtHR
- 2.1 General aspects
- 2.2 Review of national courts
- 2.3 Review of the national legislature
- 3 The role of national courts
- 4 Conclusion
- 5 National courts and judicial disobedience to the ECHR: a comparative overview*
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Openness and internationalisation
- 3 The super-legislative authority of the ECHR
- 4 The price of success: raising barriers against the ECHR
- 5 Limits to following the European Court of Human Rights' case law: a focus on the Italian case
- 6 Final remarks
- 6 The advisory jurisdiction of the ECtHR under Protocol No. 16: enhancing domestic implementation of human rights or a symbolic step?
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Existing advisory jurisdictions and the aims of Protocol No. 16
- 2.1 Article 47 of ECHR and reasons underlying its limited scope
- 2.2 Background, constitutional elements and models for the new advisory jurisdiction
- 2.3 The objectives of Protocol No. 16: a first step in what direction?
- 3 Characteristics of the procedure and the essence of advisory opinions
- 3.1 The optional jurisdiction and organisational flexibility
- 3.2 The contents of advisory opinions and formulation of questions of principle
- 3.3 The admissibility of requests for advisory opinions
- 3.4 Who will take part in the advisory opinion procedure?
- 3.5 The priority of the procedure
- 3.6 Reasoned opinion and separate opinions
- 4 Assessment of the impact of advisory opinions on domestic implementation and case flow to ECtHR
- 5 The overlapping contentious and advisory jurisdictions of the ECtHR
- 6 Impact on parties in the domestic proceedings pending in the requesting court
- 7 CJEU's critical approach – a final blow to Protocol No. 16?
- 8 Conclusion
- 7 Flying or landing? The pilot judgment procedure in the changing European human rights architecture
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Origins and goals
- 3 What is a pilot judgment procedure?
- 4 The practising pilot
- 5 When to apply it?
- 6 Conclusion
- 8 The Court of Justice and fundamental rights: if margin of appreciation is the solution, what is the problem?*
- 1 Introduction
- 2 When is ‘margin of appreciation' used (explicitly) in EU law?
- 3 Fundamental rights in EU law: interpreting the limits on competence
- 4 Fundamental rights in EU law: from policy choice to competence limit?
- 4.1 Applying margin of discretion as a policy choice: Schmidberger and Omega
- 4.2 A new constitutional framework?
- 5 Implications for the broader system of EU law
- 6 Conclusion
- 9 From flexible to variable standards of judicial review: the responsible domestic courts doctrine at the European Court of Human Rights*
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Standards of judicial review and comparative constitutional law: a framework
- 3 Effective and dynamic interpretation, margin of appreciation and the flexible ECtHR standards of review
- 4 Responsible courts doctrine: towards a variable standard of judicial review of domestic courts?
- 5 Responsible courts doctrine: a form of margin of appreciation?
- 6 The doctrinal weaknesses of the responsible courts doctrine
- 7 Conclusion
- 10 Speaking the same language? Comparing judicial restraint at the ECtHR and the ECJ*
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Comparing the ECHR and the EU fundamental rights regime
- 2.1 Key features of the two systems
- 2.2 To what extent is a margin of appreciation appropriate?
- 3 Towards a common language?
- 3.1 The distinction between the systemic and the normative
- 3.2 Systemic restraint
- 3.3 Normative elements of restraint
- 3.4 Overlap between systemic and normative elements of restraint
- 4 Conclusions
- 11 Squaring the circle at the battle at Brighton: is the war between protecting human rights or respecting sovereignty over, or has it just begun?*
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The margin of appreciation doctrine
- 3 Criticism of the present margin of appreciation doctrine
- 4 A modest defence of the current doctrine
- 5 Subsidiarity
- 6 Applying subsidiarity to the margin of appreciation doctrine
- 6.1 The objective of the ECtHR
- 6.2 The role of the ECtHR as a regional court in a multilevel order
- 6.3 Why a margin of appreciation? An argument from subsidiarity
- 7 Conclusion: criticisms reconsidered
- Index
UM RAFBÆKUR Á HEIMKAUP.IS
Bókahillan þín er þitt svæði og þar eru bækurnar þínar geymdar. Þú kemst í bókahilluna þína hvar og hvenær sem er í tölvu eða snjalltæki. Einfalt og þægilegt!Rafbók til eignar
Rafbók til eignar þarf að hlaða niður á þau tæki sem þú vilt nota innan eins árs frá því bókin er keypt.
Þú kemst í bækurnar hvar sem er
Þú getur nálgast allar raf(skóla)bækurnar þínar á einu augabragði, hvar og hvenær sem er í bókahillunni þinni. Engin taska, enginn kyndill og ekkert vesen (hvað þá yfirvigt).
Auðvelt að fletta og leita
Þú getur flakkað milli síðna og kafla eins og þér hentar best og farið beint í ákveðna kafla úr efnisyfirlitinu. Í leitinni finnur þú orð, kafla eða síður í einum smelli.
Glósur og yfirstrikanir
Þú getur auðkennt textabrot með mismunandi litum og skrifað glósur að vild í rafbókina. Þú getur jafnvel séð glósur og yfirstrikanir hjá bekkjarsystkinum og kennara ef þeir leyfa það. Allt á einum stað.
Hvað viltu sjá? / Þú ræður hvernig síðan lítur út
Þú lagar síðuna að þínum þörfum. Stækkaðu eða minnkaðu myndir og texta með multi-level zoom til að sjá síðuna eins og þér hentar best í þínu námi.
Fleiri góðir kostir
- Þú getur prentað síður úr bókinni (innan þeirra marka sem útgefandinn setur)
- Möguleiki á tengingu við annað stafrænt og gagnvirkt efni, svo sem myndbönd eða spurningar úr efninu
- Auðvelt að afrita og líma efni/texta fyrir t.d. heimaverkefni eða ritgerðir
- Styður tækni sem hjálpar nemendum með sjón- eða heyrnarskerðingu
- Gerð : 208
- Höfundur : 10906
- Útgáfuár : 2016
- Leyfi : 379